MS Paint: Breakfast With Bird - Munter / Rumpelton

Breakfast With Bird

• Ralph Rumpelton
• Breakfast With Bird
• RR-2026 - 108
  MS Paint on digital canvas, 573 X 579 px
• The Rumpelton Continuity (est. 1976)

What the critics are saying:

>>Dr. Norbert F. Vensmire (b. 1947, location disputed)

In this quietly disobedient tableau, Rumpelton reconfigures the domestic scene into what I have elsewhere termed a diurnally inverted phenomenology—that is, the breakfast one encounters only after abandoning the notion of breakfast altogether. The anonymous figure, rendered in a chromatic register both muted and obstinately opaque, sits not before a window but before what Vico might have called a “threshold of recursive witnessing.” The bird, that perennial emissary of the outside world, perches with a deliberateness that suggests it is evaluating us rather than the seated subject.

The mise-en-scène—those curtains in their unrepentant carmine, that pastoral landscape oscillating between abstraction and topographical indifference—invokes the early Expressionists only to exceed them. Indeed, the faintly misaligned window frame is not error but intentional destabilization: a rejection of Euclidean obedience in favor of what I attribute to Rumpelton’s mature period, the axiom of necessary skew.

Particularly notable is the slice of food (pie? custard? a metaphysical wedge of caloric signification), which becomes the painting’s unlikely fulcrum. Here, Rumpelton demonstrates his long-held conviction that “the quotidian object, when poorly rendered, becomes an ontological event.”¹

Ultimately, Breakfast With Bird situates itself within the Rumpeltonian canon as a work of sui generis luminosity—an image that refuses the false hierarchy between inner quietude and external spectacle. As ever, Rumpelton reminds us that even in the pixelated margins of low-fidelity art, the world continues to stare back.<<

>>Gerald Thimbleton, Beige Canvas Quarterly

“Munter – Rumpelton / Breakfast With Bird” is a textbook example of what happens when digital dilettantism masquerades as painterly intent. The figure—faceless, postureless, and rendered with the emotional depth of a screensaver—sits before a table that might as well be a cafeteria tray. The birds, those poor symbols of transcendence, are reduced to white smudges, like someone spilled correction fluid on a student sketch. And the so-called ‘wheel’—is it a barrel? A halo? A misplaced bicycle part?—hovers with all the conviction of a forgotten prop in a community theater set. Munter’s palette is bold, yes, but so is a traffic light. This is not still life. This is stillborn.”

Follow Ralph Rumpelton acrosss the net.