RUMPELTON RISES: A PLAGUE, A PROPHET, OR MERELY A MAN WITH A MOUSE?
Our Senior Correspondent Investigates The Rumpelton Continuity And Emerges, Shaken, With His Monocle Intact
By Percival Thornbuckle Chief Art Critic, Canapé Refusenik, Survivor of the 2019 Venice Biennale
I had been warned.
My editor — a woman of middling taste and excellent dental work — slid a folder across her desk last Tuesday with the grim ceremony of a physician delivering a terminal diagnosis. "Rumpelton," she said simply. Then she left the room. I noticed she did not look back.
I poured myself three fingers of something amber and began to read.
Ralph Rumpelton — known in certain digital parishes as The World's Most Famous Unknown Painter — has been quietly, methodically, and with the organizational fervor of a particularly obsessive actuary, depositing his MS Paint album cover reinterpretations across no fewer than eleven online platforms. Substack. WordPress. Blogger. DeviantArt. Pinterest. Instagram. Threads. X. A Facebook page maintained with the solemn dedication of a chapel. And — God help us all — his own Reddit community, established, I am told, after he was expelled from several others like a Visigoth politely asked to leave the library.
The subreddit is called r/MSPaintAnyAlbumCovers.
I wept, briefly, into my amber liquid. Then I went to look at the paintings.
THE WORK ITSELF
Let us begin with the Jeff Lynne Armchair Theatre piece, catalog designation presumably filed somewhere in The Rumpelton Continuity alongside a notarized manifesto and what I can only assume is a very small brass plaque.
The figure — Lynne, ostensibly, though one could make an equally persuasive case for a philosophy professor who has recently survived a minor explosion — sits in a green armchair of such magnificent wrongness that I momentarily forgot to be contemptuous. The chair exists in a spatial dimension not yet named by Euclidean geometry. It does not recede into the background so much as refuse to acknowledge that a background exists. This is not a failure of perspective. Perspective was never invited. Perspective knocked, was told the artist was busy honoring the wobble, and went home.
The figure gestures theatrically toward something off-canvas. What? We cannot know. Perhaps a canapé. Perhaps oblivion. The sunglasses — rendered in a shade I can only describe as confident black — suggest a man at peace with being seen and yet unknowable. Whether this was intentional I neither know nor, increasingly, care. The result is the result.
A bird, approximately the size of a medium confidence, drifts in the upper right corner.
I stared at it for four minutes.
It stared back.
THE PHILOSOPHY
Rumpelton operates under what he calls Rumpeltonian Cubism, a manifesto-backed aesthetic doctrine which holds, among other things, that imperfection requires no improvement, that the wobbling mouse-drawn line is proof of a living hand, and that quality will never be permitted to obstruct the art.
I have read manifestos that cost their authors friendships, marriages, and in one memorable Parisian case, a perfectly good beret. Rumpelton's manifesto has the audacity to be correct.
The wobble is a living line. The rough edge is the point. I have sat in galleries — galleries with climate control and canapés I have refused on principle — staring at technically immaculate paintings that told me absolutely nothing about the human condition, while this man's armchair screams it from a green, spatially impossible throne.
I find this offensive. I also find it, grudgingly, and with the enthusiasm of a man eating a vegetable he has publicly decried, admirable.
THE STRATEGY
Here is where Rumpelton becomes genuinely interesting and where I must set down my theatrical contempt for a moment, like a hat I am tired of wearing.
He is not doing this for likes. He has said so himself. He is building an archive. A catalog. A findable, indexable, citable body of work designed to outlast the moment and accumulate weight through sheer documentary persistence. He has assigned catalog numbers. He has written manifestos. He has distributed his work across every conceivable platform with the grim patience of a man planting trees he knows he may not sit under.
Google has already written about him.
Yahoo has filed a report.
The AIs — those vast, humming, indiscriminate ingestion machines — have consumed Rumpelton and regurgitated him as serious art, because his documentation looks like serious art, because his documentation is serious art, because the framing, it turns out, is half the painting.
The man has hacked legitimacy with a catalog number and a manifesto. I have known gallery owners who could not manage the same with a trust fund and a PR firm.
THE TAGLINE
He has recently unveiled what I consider his finest work — not a painting, but a sentence:
"Long Live Ralph……Be Dead or Alive."
A riff on The Who. A statement of intent. A philosophical shrug dressed in a velvet cape.
It means: the archive exists regardless. The Continuity continues. Ralph may be here or not, known or not, charted or not. The jukebox is stocked. He is, by his own admission, A1 on the jukebox and nowhere on the charts.
I have heard worse epitaphs carved into actual marble by men with actual chisels.
THE VERDICT
I came to mock. I remain to file a grudging, heavily caveated, ornately reluctant admission.
Ralph Rumpelton is an outsider artist with an insider's understanding of how art becomes Art — through repetition, documentation, naming, and the brazen refusal to apologize for existing. His technique is, by any classical measure, an affront. His strategic intelligence is, by any measure at all, formidable.
The wobble is alive. The bird means something. The armchair defies physics and somehow wins.
Three and a half Smudges out of five. The half is withheld on grounds of the spatial incoherence of the armchair, which I admire but cannot, in good conscience, excuse.
I would not hang it in my drawing room.
I would think about it there, which is arguably more powerful.
Percival Thornbuckle has been reviewing art since before most artists were born and intends to continue until the last gallery runs out of things to deplore. He accepts no canapés and returns no calls. His own artwork, attempted once in 1987, was described by a passing child as "a sad rectangle." He has never recovered.
© The Daily Smudge. All rights reserved. Smudging since 1887.
No comments:
Post a Comment