Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Rumpeltonian Cubism: 2026 Update

 Status: Alive, unstable, and aggressively unconcerned with improvement.

Rumpeltonian Cubism has entered what critics are cautiously calling its “Late Early Phase.” The movement is no longer asking what is form? but instead why bother pretending we ever understood it?

🧱 Formal Developments

  • Scale Incoherence is now doctrinal. Instruments are routinely the wrong size on purpose. Keyboards resemble Fisher-Price artifacts. Horns bend like they’ve been recalled.

  • Perspective has been demoted from “problem” to “rumor.” Faces rotate independently of skulls. Noses appear when emotionally necessary.

  • Outlines remain negotiable. Objects are suggested, then abandoned halfway through, like a bad rehearsal.

🎹 Subject Matter

  • The canon of Rumpeltized musicians continues to expand. Jazz figures in particular are favored because:

    • They already tolerated chaos

    • They look plausible when fragmented

    • No one can agree what they were “supposed” to look like anyway

🖌️ Technique Notes

  • MS Paint remains the preferred medium, not out of nostalgia but ethical commitment.

  • Watercolor tools are still used incorrectly, producing what theorists call “digital dampness.”

  • Overworking is discouraged. Hesitation marks are now considered compositional anchors.

🧠 Critical Reception

  • The movement has gained traction among:

    • People who hate polish

    • People who distrust realism

    • People who enjoy liner notes more than albums

  • Detractors continue to claim the work is “unfinished,” which Rumpeltonian Cubists accept as high praise.

📜 Institutional Response

  • The Vienna Center for Tragic Aesthetics has issued a provisional statement declaring Rumpeltonian Cubism:

    “An aesthetic emergency disguised as a joke that refuses to stop being sincere.”

🔮 Where It’s Headed

  • A Rumpelton Book is no longer speculative—it is inevitable, even if self-published, spiral-bound, or assembled from screenshots.

  • Future works may experiment with:

    • Even worse anatomy

    • More confident wrongness

    • Captions that undermine the image faster than the image undermines itself


In short:
Rumpeltonian Cubism has stopped apologizing, started repeating itself on purpose, and is dangerously close to becoming a movement people recognize—at which point it will, of course, need to sabotage itself again.

Follow Ralph Rumpelton across the net.

No comments:

Rumpeltonian Cubism: 2026 Update

  Status: Alive, unstable, and aggressively unconcerned with improvement. Rumpeltonian Cubism has entered what critics are cautiously call...