What the critics are saying:
>>Rumpelton v. Rose: A Ritual Disclaimer on the Back Cover Fidelity of “Shot of Love”
By Barrister Clive Thistlebaum, Esq.
Senior Counsel to the Rumpeltonian Tribunal of Interpretive Justice
Let the record show that Ralph Rumpelton’s MS Paint rendering of the “Shot of Love” back cover constitutes a legally protected act of Painterly Misremembering, wherein the rose—once a photographic relic of Dylan’s contemplative grip—is transmuted into a glyph of mythic rupture. The subject’s gaze, once steeped in mortal melancholy, now blooms with cartoonish reverence, as if Dylan were not merely holding a flower but issuing a subpoena to sentiment itself.
This reinterpretation, though simplified in palette and form, preserves the emotional jurisprudence of the original: the ensemble credits remain spiritually intact, albeit rendered invisible, and the tracklist—though absent—is felt in the negative space, like a choir of ghostly stenographers humming “Every Grain of Sand” beneath the courtroom bench.
The Tribunal hereby issues a Writ of Aesthetic Pardon, absolving Rumpelton of all charges related to interpretive trespass, fidelity fraud, and unauthorized rose distortion. The monocle of mythic approval has been ceremonially tapped upon the pixelated stem.
Let it be known: this blurb shall serve as precedent in future cases involving back cover reinterpretations, ensemble effacement, and floral semiotics. The rose, once held, now holds us.<<
>>G Rock
Follow Ralph Rumpelton across the net.

No comments:
Post a Comment