What the critics are saying:
>>Paint Fidelity Series: Highway 61, Revisited
MS Paint (left) after photographic original (right)
Blurb by Dr. Norbert F. Vensmire
In this bifurcated presentation, Rumpelton stages what can only be described—in extremis—as a confrontation between sanctioned cool and its deliberate unraveling. The original image, on the right, performs its historical duty with practised nonchalance: posture, jacket, gaze, all aligned in the familiar grammar of mid-century myth-making. It is an image that knows exactly what it is supposed to be.
The MS Paint translation, by contrast, refuses fluency. Fidelity here is not mimetic but procedural. What is preserved is not likeness but decision: the blunt limb, the flattened face, the jacket reduced to a patterned suggestion rather than a textile fact. Each pixel operates qua pixel, asserting its own sovereignty rather than submitting to illusion. This is not incompetence; it is a strategic lowering of resolution, a chromatic schism enacted in real time.
Most revealing is the asymmetry between intention and outcome. Where the photograph naturalizes attitude, the painting destabilizes it, rendering coolness faintly provisional, even awkward. The figure remains recognizable yet estranged, sui generis, caught between icon and diagram. One senses that the painting knows the photograph intimately—and then chooses, almost petulantly, to forget it.
Rumpelton’s Paint Fidelity Series thus functions as a quiet act of resistance. By insisting on low-fidelity translation, the work exposes how much cultural authority resides not in the subject but in the smoothness of its reproduction. This image does not compete with history; it pixelates it. And in doing so, it reminds us that misalignment is not a flaw but a method.<<
>>Paint Fidelity Series: Bob Dylan – Highway 61 Revisited (Greasy Spoon Edition) by G. Rock
Follow Ralph Rumpelton across the net.

No comments:
Post a Comment