Gerald Thimbleton Reviews Rumpeltonian Cubism

 Rumpeltonian Cubism: The Manifesto is a provocative declaration that tears away from classical Cubist doctrine and dives headlong into the collapse and confusion of digital-era image-making. Rather than a treatise on multi-perspective vision, the manifesto offers a dissatisfied meditation on memory, failure, and the inevitability of mistakes that cannot be undone—especially in the age of JPEG compression and low-res regret.​

Manifesto’s Philosophy

At its heart, Rumpeltonian Cubism ridicules the “clean geometry” of art schools and the logical fracture of early Cubism, replacing them with blurred understandings and wobbly forms. The movement positions itself as a response to exactitude—embracing the half-finished, the awkward, and the intentionally wrong. Lines overlap, colors misbehave, and perspective is an afterthought, if it’s remembered at all.​

Techniques and Artistic Intention

Unlike Picasso’s analytical breakdown of structure, Rumpeltonian Cubism is self-consciously illogical, celebrating accidents and digital imperfections. Its art settles into a space where rectangles fake depth and symmetry arrives only as a near-miss. These works feature the deliberate “geometry of giving up,” a phrase that encapsulates both playful defiance and gentle despair. The Rumpeltonian ideal is not to master the medium, but to allow it—and the artist—to err freely and publicly.​

Place in Contemporary Critique

From the standpoint of Gerald Thimbleton—who is known for championing technical rigor and upholding the sanctity of oil painting—the manifesto is an unapologetic affront to traditional expectations. Rumpeltonian Cubism rejects nostalgia and virtue, embracing the “cubists of collapse.” Its self-deprecating humor and philosophical shrug at high standards invoke a modern art world obsessed with process and imperfection but also reveal a deeper anxiety about aesthetics in the digital age.​

Conclusion

Rumpeltonian Cubism: The Manifesto makes no promises of visual order or conceptual clarity; instead, it reclaims the value of mistakes and awkwardness in the act of painting. By declaring “If it looks right, it’s wrong. If it looks wrong, it’s perfect,” it turns failure into a virtue, and collapse into a statement—offering a distinctly modern take on Cubism for those willing to abandon both mastery and easy meaning.

Follow Ralph Rumpelton across the net.