MS Paint: "Still Life with Cowardice" / "Ralph Rumpelton" Art

                                                           Still Life with Cowardice
                                                     Ralph Rumpelton, MS Paint, 2025

A work that confronts the banality of domestic space through deliberate perspectival dissonance. The table’s objects—candles, foliage, and an ambiguous book—hover between order and collapse, suggesting that cowardice lies not in retreat but in refusal to resolve.

—Signed, Aurelia Thorne, Associate Curator of Indeterminate Objects

 What the critics are saying:

>>“Still Life with Cowardice”

by Marjorie Snint (or whoever she is)

This latest glyph from Ralph Rumpelton offers a tableau so meticulously arranged it borders on passive aggression. The candles, unlit and symmetrical, suggest a ritual abandoned mid-incantation. The bouquet of yellow flowers—too cheerful, too contained—feels like a hostage note written in petals. Even the magazine, with its abstract black-and-white cover, seems to whisper, “I once had potential.”

Rumpelton’s signature, tucked apologetically in the corner, is the final betrayal: a myth-maker pretending to be a guest in his own archive. The composition is technically sound, emotionally evasive, and spiritually beige. It is a painting that dares you to feel nothing—and succeeds.

Some will call it cozy. I call it a crime scene where rupture was murdered and order buried the body beneath a coffee table.<<

>>Dr. Norbert F. Vensmire

Royal Institute of Semiotic Studies (Emeritus)

"Still Life with Cowardice" (MS Paint, 2025) represents, in extremis, the apotheosis of Rumpeltonian praxis. The perspectival “errors”—those wayward angles, those quasi-Cubistic candle-stalks—are not errors at all, but deliberate ruptures in ocular expectation. One recalls the dictum of the late Balthus: “The mistake is the motif.”

The flattened vegetalia (qua pixelated chlorophyll) and the half-masticated glyph of a book perform a double maneuver: they affirm the banality of the domestic tableau while simultaneously negating it. It is, sui generis, a meditation on cowardice—not in the moral sense, but in the optical. Rumpelton dares to not dare, to withhold bravura draftsmanship in favor of something more corrosive: the shrug of modernity.

Note, too, the signature in the lower left: “Ralph Rumpelton.” It is at once confession and provocation, as if to say: Yes, I authored this, and what of it? In a cultural economy drunk on virtuosity, such restraint is incendiary.

Indeed, I am compelled to argue that Rumpelton’s refusal to “finish” is his most radical gesture. To view this work is to feel the ground of taste dissolve beneath one’s feet, leaving us suspended—precarious, bemused—in the Byzantium of our pixelated age.<<

>>Bertrand "The Brush" Barnaby:

"Ralph Rumpelton's latest MS Paint opus is a confounding exercise in...well, one isn't quite sure what. A living room, perhaps? The sort of place where one might find a sofa, a coffee table, and a vague sense of domesticity? The composition is haphazard, the perspective askew, and the forms resolutely primitive. And yet, despite its myriad shortcomings, the piece exudes a certain je ne sais quoi, a naive charm that is almost—but not quite—redemptive. One wonders if Rumpelton's deliberate primitivism is a commentary on the vacuity of modern life or simply a reflection of his own technical limitations. Regardless, it's a fascinating misfire, and one can't help but be drawn in by the sheer, unapologetic wrongness of it all."<<

Follow Ralph Rumpelton across the net.