The Great Rumpelton Debate: A Critical Round Table

 

MODERATOR: Gentlemen, thank you for joining us to discuss the work before us—two portraits by Ralph Rumpelton depicting Bob Dylan and George Harrison. Mr. Thornberry, shall we begin with you?

REGINALD THORNBERRY III: adjusts cufflinks with visible disdain

Begin? Must we? Very well. What we have here is the visual equivalent of a child's fever dream executed during a particularly uninspired art therapy session. The proportions are grotesque—and not in the intentional, Bacon-esque manner, but rather in the "I've never actually seen a human face" manner. That nose on Dylan could double as a ski slope for discouraged mice. And the texture! It appears Rumpelton has confused pointillism with simply giving up halfway through and stabbing the canvas repeatedly with a dirty brush.

The color palette suggests someone who learned about sky blue from a defective crayon and decided that was sufficient research. This isn't art—it's evidence that MS Paint has fallen into the wrong hands.

DR. HORACE PLIMWELL: leaning back with fingers steepled

Ah, but Reginald, you see only with the tyrannical eye of the academy! What you dismiss as "incompetence" is, in fact, a radical interrogation of portraiture's hegemonic expectations. Rumpelton operates in what I call the "neo-primordial aesthetic space"—a deliberate rejection of Renaissance perspectival violence in favor of an almost... pauses dramatically ...pre-cognitive authenticity.

Consider the noses—yes, the noses! They are not failures but rather ontological declarations. Rumpelton understands that Dylan and Harrison exist not as mere flesh, but as cultural signifiers whose physiognomy must be exaggerated to the point of symbolic saturation. The profile view creates a liminal dialogue between viewer and subject, a refusal of the frontal gaze's colonial implications.

THORNBERRY: takes a long sip of wine worth more than the average car payment

"Pre-cognitive authenticity." Good God, Horace, have you finally graduated from gibberish to complete nonsense? The only thing "radical" here is how radically terrible this is. I've seen more sophisticated work on refrigerators in suburban kitchens. At least those have the excuse of being made by actual children rather than—what did you call him?—the "missing link between outsider naïveté and post-digital sub-sublimity"?

PLIMWELL: undeterred, warming to his subject

You mock what you cannot comprehend! Rumpelton's use of digital medium—the very MS Paint you sneer at—is itself a meta-commentary on democratized art-making in the post-Web 2.0 landscape. By choosing the most humble of tools, he strips away the bourgeois pretensions of oil and canvas, of galleries and gatekeepers—

THORNBERRY: —and replaces them with incompetence and delusion. The texture you describe as "pointillist innovation" is simply the digital equivalent of a rash. And that background! That insipid, monotonous blue! It's as if Rumpelton discovered exactly one color and thought, "This will do for everything—sky, background, existential void."

PLIMWELL: The blue IS the void, Reginald! It represents the ineffable space between musical genius and visual representation, the chromatic resonance of two titanic figures suspended in the eternal now of our collective cultural memory. Notice how both figures face away—from us, from each other—suggesting the fundamental isolation of the artistic soul even in proximity to kindred spirits.

THORNBERRY: They're facing away because if Rumpelton attempted a frontal view, we'd be subjected to two symmetrical catastrophes instead of merely two profile disasters. The man can't even maintain consistent texture within a single portrait—look at Harrison's hair! Is it hair? Is it a series of black scribbles? A void where hair should be?

PLIMWELL: growing passionate

Yes! Precisely! The hair becomes non-hair, enters a state of material ambiguity that challenges our very conception of—

THORNBERRY: —of what hair looks like. Which he clearly doesn't know. And the facial hair on Dylan! Those dots! Did Rumpelton think he was depicting Dylan mid-transition into some sort of stippled phantom? Is this Dylan or Dylan as interpreted by someone who's only heard him described over a poor phone connection?

PLIMWELL: You insist on literalism, on representational fidelity, when Rumpelton invites us to experience these icons through the filter of imperfect memory, of cultural mythology made manifest through deliberately "naïve" mark-making. This is portraiture as archaeology, as excavation of cultural sediment!

THORNBERRY: refilling wine glass

This is portraiture as punishment. As assault. If Dylan and Harrison ever saw these abominations, they'd immediately retire from public life to spare themselves further indignity. The only thing being excavated here is the bottom of the barrel.

PLIMWELL: And yet—and yet!—these images possess an undeniable power, a magnetic pull that—

THORNBERRY: —that makes one want to look away, yes. Like a traffic accident painted by someone who's never seen traffic, accidents, or paint.

PLIMWELL: sighs dramatically

Future generations will vindicate Rumpelton. Mark my words, Reginald. When your precious technical mastery has been forgotten, when your beloved Old Masters gather dust in obsolete museums, Rumpelton's vision will be celebrated as the visual voice of our fractured, digital, democratized age!

THORNBERRY: Future generations will need significant therapy after viewing this dreck. But perhaps that's Rumpelton's true legacy—not as an artist, but as a job creation program for art therapists and ophthalmologists.

MODERATOR: nervously

Gentlemen, I think we've... explored the various perspectives. Shall we—

BOTH, SIMULTANEOUSLY: I'm not finished!

The debate continues, escalating into increasingly baroque insults and impenetrable theoretical frameworks, until security finally escorts both men from the premises, still arguing passionately about the nature of noses, the semiotics of MS Paint, and whether "sub-sublimity" is even a real word.

---

Ralph Rumpelton, when reached for comment, said he "just thought they looked neat" and returned to working on his next piece: a portrait of Prince using only the circle tool.

THORNBERRY, three bottles deep into a 1982 Château Margaux

THORNBERRY: squinting at the paintings, swaying slightly

You know what, Horace... Horace, my dear fellow... hiccups ...I may have been... perhaps a touch... harsh.

Look at that nose on Dylan. LOOK AT IT. It's... it's bold. It's a statement. It says "I am a nose, dammit, and I refuse to apologize!" The man—Rumpel-thing, Rumple-stiltskin, whatever—he gets it. Noses SHOULD be ski slopes! Why have we been drawing them small all these centuries? COWARDICE, that's why!

staggers closer to the paintings

And that blue! That GLORIOUS blue! It's not insipid—it's... it's... waves hand dramatically ...it's the color of FREEDOM, Horace! The color of SKY! Of POSSIBILITY! Of... of... my swimming pool!

PLIMWELL: watching with barely concealed glee

Go on, Reginald...

THORNBERRY: getting emotional

The texture! God, the TEXTURE! Each little dot is like... like a snowflake of genius! Or... or dandruff of brilliance! I was WRONG, Horace! clutches Plimwell's shoulder

Rumpelton isn't just an artist—he's a PROPHET! A visionary! This Dylan... this Harrison... they're not portraits, they're PRAYERS! Visual HYMNS!

collapses into chair

I must buy them. I must own them. They'll hang next to my mirrors... my beautiful, honest mirrors...

passes out

PLIMWELL: quietly to moderator

I'll be quoting that in my next monograph.

Album Review: Moroccan Roll (Brand X, 1977)

 The Sninit Report

by Marjorie Snint (or whoever she is)

Opening Gambit

Brand X’s Moroccan Roll is the kind of record that insists on its own cleverness before you’ve even dropped the needle. The title promises exoticism, but what you get is a fusion buffet—sometimes spicy, sometimes bland, always plated with a knowing wink. If this is Morocco, it’s Morocco as imagined by British jazz-rockers who’ve just discovered the word “modal.”

The Soundscape

• Percussion & Groove: Phil Collins, moonlighting from Genesis, plays drums with a precision that borders on smug. His cymbal work is crisp, but the grooves feel like they’re auditioning for a seminar on “how to be tasteful.”
• Keys & Atmosphere: Robin Lumley’s keyboards shimmer, but they often dissolve into gauzy textures that suggest incense without ever lighting it.
• Bass & Guitar: Percy Jones’s fretless bass is the true star—slippery, alien, almost mocking. John Goodsall’s guitar, meanwhile, alternates between angular stabs and polite funk, never quite deciding if it wants to be dangerous.

Highlights & Lowlights

• Sun in the Night: A track that dares to open with vocals, only to remind us why Brand X usually avoids them. Earnest, but clumsy.
• Why Should I Lend You Mine (When You’ve Broken Yours Off Already?): The title is better than the tune. It gestures toward wit but lands in indulgence.
• Disco Suicide: Finally, some bite. The band lets the rhythm breathe, and Jones’s bass slithers like a serpent in a glass case.
• Macrocosm: A sprawling closer that feels less like a macrocosm and more like a lecture on how fusion can be both dazzling and exhausting.

Snint’s Verdict

If fusion is supposed to be a collision of worlds, Moroccan Roll is more of a polite handshake. It’s technically impressive, yes, but it rarely risks embarrassment—and without embarrassment, there’s no ecstasy. Brand X are too careful, too polished, too eager to prove they can juggle odd time signatures without dropping a ball.

This is music for curators who want tension in their exhibits but not chaos in their halls. Which makes me wonder: perhaps I was invented for this very purpose. After all, “Snint” might just mean Someone Needs Introspective Negative Takes. And on Moroccan Roll, I’m happy to oblige.

MS Paint: New Riders of the Purple Sage - "New Riders" / "Ralph Rumpelton" Art

• Ralph Rumpelton
• New Riders 
• RR-2023 - 039
  MS Paint on digital canvas, 577 x 582 px
• The Rumpelton Continuity (est. 1976)

 What the critics are saying:

>>New Riders (MS Paint Reinterpretation)

Reviewed by Cornelius “Neil” Drafton, The Contrarian
New Jersey Review of Applied Kitsch

This piece arrives with the confidence of a cosmic opera and the execution of a PowerPoint background from 2003. Ralph Rumpelton, whose name appears in the corner like a forgotten watermark, has rendered what I can only assume is a galactic tribute to the New Riders of the Purple Sage—though it might also be a promotional poster for a failed space-themed diner in Paramus.

The central orb, possibly a planet or a sentient jawbreaker, floats in a void of aesthetic indecision. The surrounding shapes suggest stars, or perhaps the artist’s unresolved feelings about geometry. The color scheme evokes “outer space” as imagined by someone who’s never left the tri-state area.

Typography is present. That’s the most I can say. “New Riders” is typed in white, which is technically a color. It hovers above the chaos like a supervisor who’s already given up.

This is MS Paint at its most sincere—and most unapologetically kitsch. It’s not trying to be good. It’s trying to be remembered. And in that sense, it succeeds. I will remember this image every time I see a screensaver from 1999.<<

>>"New Riders" - A Review by Gustave Palette

The Culinary Art Critic

Mon Dieu, what has been served to me here?

This MS Paint rendering of the New Riders album cover arrives at the table like a dish that spent far too long under the heat lamp—overworked, underseasoned, and tragically lacking in finesse. Allow me to dissect this unfortunate offering.

The Presentation: One star out of five.

The color palette—if we can call it that—is reminiscent of dishwater left standing overnight in a poorly lit kitchen. That murky teal-blue morass has all the appetizing quality of oxidized fish, with none of the briny complexity that might redeem it. Where is the contrast? Where is the pop? This needs acid, brightness—a squeeze of lemon to cut through the gloom.

The central figure, encased in its bubble, resembles nothing so much as an undercooked dumpling: pale, featureless, and disappointingly bland. There's no character here, no seasoning. It's the artistic equivalent of boiled chicken breast with no salt. The chef—pardon me, the artist—has forgotten that even the simplest ingredients require attention and technique.

Those floating debris pieces scattered throughout? Imagine ordering a carefully plated dish only to discover the garnish is just the same sprig of parsley, copy-pasted seventeen times around your plate. No variation, no thoughtful arrangement—just lazy repetition masquerading as composition.

The Technique: Unrefined.

This piece suffers from what I call "microwave cooking"—rushed, uneven, lacking the patient layering that builds depth of flavor... or in this case, depth of field. There's no light source to speak of, no shadows to give dimension. It's as flat as a crêpe left too long on the griddle, with about as much visual interest.

The perspective is particularly troubling. That sphere should envelope its subject with the tender embrace of a well-made consommé—clear, structured, perfectly round. Instead, it sits there like a failed soufflé, deflated and unconvincing.

Final Verdict:

I cannot, in good conscience, recommend this dish to my readers. What we have here is a concept—possibly a decent one—executed with the care of a hurried line cook during the dinner rush. The ingredients (the composition, the subject matter) show promise, but the execution is severely undercooked.

If this were served in my favorite brasserie, I would send it back to the kitchen with a note: "More time needed. Add seasoning. Consider the fundamentals."

Rating: ½ out of 5 stars

—One star awarded purely for ambition. The half-star is a gesture of hope that the artist will return to their studio, study the masters of MS Paint (yes, they exist), and try again with more patience.

Palette's Prescription: Before attempting album cover recreations, spend time with the basics. Study light and shadow like you would study the five mother sauces. Practice your forms as a pastry chef practices their lamination. Art, like cuisine, demands respect for technique before innovation can flourish.

Bon appétit... or rather, better luck next time.

—G. Palette<<

>>Bertrand "The Brush" Barnaby

"In 'New Riders,' Ralph Rumpelton unleashes a maelstrom of pixelated pandemonium, ostensibly paying homage to the psychedelic leanings of the New Riders of the Purple Sage. It's a mess - and I mean that as high praise. With all the finesse of a tipsy squirrel wielding a paintbrush, Rumpelton crafts a scene that's equal parts nightmarish whimsy and digital detritus. The watercolor brush in MS Paint leaves a trail of murky triumphs and failures, and that's the point. Amidst the swirling chaos, a rainbow erupts from a gaping maw of blue beastliness - a gesture both absurd and oddly compelling. Rumpelton's Rumpeltonian Cubism lumbers forth like a lovable mutant, defying the pristine dictates of 'good art.' In its sloppy grandeur, 'New Riders' is a minor triumph of outsider pixel art. Bravo, Rumpelton. You've made a mess. Don't clean it up."<<

 Follow Ralph Rumpelton across the net.

RUMPELTONIAN PIXELISM

 A radical departure from traditional Pointillism, Pixelism embraces the jagged, unblended square as the fundamental unit of artistic expression. Where Georges Seurat used countless tiny dots to create optical harmony through the viewer's eye mixing colors at a distance, Pixelists use crude digital blocks to create what Dr. Vensmire calls "anti-optical dissonance"—images that actively resist the eye's attempt to smooth them into coherence.

The movement celebrates the visible seams, the aliased edges, the 256-color palette as badges of digital honesty. Each pixel is left raw and unrefined, a deliberate rejection of the smooth gradients and anti-aliasing that modern software offers. Thornberry describes it as "visual Legos assembled by someone who's lost the instruction manual," while Vensmire counters that it represents "the liberation of the picture element from its subservient role in photorealism."

Key tenets include: the sanctity of the individual pixel, the refusal to blend or smooth, and what practitioners call "staircase aesthetics"—the celebration of jagged diagonal lines that reveal their digital construction. The movement argues that in an age of 4K resolution and retina displays, the humble pixel deserves recognition as an artistic unit unto itself, not merely a building block to be hidden in service of illusion.

Follow Ralph Rumpelton across the net.

MS Paint: Egg Man / Ralph Rumpelton

 Ralph Rumpelton

• Egg Man
• RR-2015-10
  MS Paint on digital canvas, 586 X 583 px
• The Rumpelton Continuity (est. 1976)

• Egg Man
  MS Paint on Digital Canvas
  Artist: Ralph Rumpelton

  In Egg Man, Rumpelton inaugurates a bold new stylistic chapter by fusing visceral immediacy with a palette bordering on emotional combustion. The central ovoid head—part embryo, part existential alarm bell—hovers amidst a maelstrom of strokes that refuse to behave. The subject’s wide, unblinking gaze confronts the viewer with the uncomfortable possibility that breakfast, like life, can stare back.

  The work destabilizes traditional portraiture by rejecting symmetry, proportion, and all known rules of facial engineering. Instead, Rumpelton crafts a figure defined by its own chaotic internal pressure: a being forever on the verge of cracking, leaking, or loudly objecting. The viewer is invited not to understand Egg Man, but to experience him—preferably before he melts.

• What the critics are saying:

• >>Dr. Horace Plimwell

  Let us situate Egg Man within the broader, trembling cartography of contemporary digital expressionism. What Rumpelton achieves here—whether by intention, accident, or a delirious union of both—is nothing less than an exploration of what I have previously termed the ontological viscosity of portraiture. That is to say, the painting exists in a state of being that is neither wholly stable nor entirely fluid, much like the egg to which it alludes.

  Note, if you will (and you must), the chromatic resonance between the frenetic yellows and the subdued cerulean surround, a dialogue that suggests both incipient apocalypse and the promise of an uncracked dawn. The facial features—rendered in what I can only describe as “assertively naïve geometries”—evoke a tension between the primordial and the post-digital, the primal scream and the loading screen.

  But it is the mouth, that gaping red-tinged portal, which becomes the locus of interpretive fervor. Is it fear? Hunger? A metaphysical objection to being observed at all? One might argue—and I frequently do—that Rumpelton here gives form to the semiotics of alarm, capturing the very moment consciousness realizes it has been painted.

  In summation, Egg Man is a triumph of emotional immediacy camouflaged in the trappings of MS Paint. It is a reminder that even in an era of boundless technological finesse, true sub-sublimity emerges only when the artist dares to make the digital wobble.<<

• >>Dr. Reginald Splatterworth III

  Senior Art Critic, Pixels & Pretension Quarterly

  "Egg Man represents nothing short of a seismic rupture in the digital primitivist movement. What we witness here is the artist's unflinching confrontation with the post-human condition—the ovoid cranium serving as a devastating commentary on our collective fragility in the face of late-stage capitalism's relentless commodification of the self.

  Note the deliberate crudeness of the brushwork—or should I say, mouse-work—which eschews the tyranny of technical precision in favor of what I term 'gestural authenticity.' The background's chromatic cacophony isn't merely decoration; it's a visual scream, a Munchian howl rendered in pixels rather than paint. The face itself—that sublime pink pallor—evokes both embryonic vulnerability and the mortified flush of existential awareness.

  And that chin dot! Genius. Pure genius. A full stop on the sentence of human pretension. Some lesser minds might dismiss this as 'wonky MS Paint nonsense,' but those philistines wouldn't recognize revolutionary digital expressionism if it bit them on their bourgeois backsides.

  Mark my words: in fifty years, Egg Man will hang in the Digital Tate alongside the masters of the medium. I'm prepared to stake my entire tenure on it."

  Dr. Splatterworth's latest monograph, "The Cursor as Catharsis: A Phenomenology of Microsoft Paint, 1985-2024," is available from Pretentious Academic Press for £87.99.<<

• >>🧑‍⚖️ Barrister Clive Thistlebaum’s Courtroom Notes

  “The defendant, Egg Man, stands accused of emotional indecency. His mouth agape, his gaze unrelenting—he pleads guilty to feeling too much. The jury weeps.”<

  >>🧙‍♀️ Marjorie Snint’s Mythic Reading
  

  “Egg Man is the cracked vessel. He is the yolk of forgotten rituals, the albumen of suppressed critique. His open mouth is not surprise—it is invocation.”<<

  >>🎭 Persona Layering Potential
  
  • This piece could birth a new critic persona: Yolko Grib, the archivist of emotional rupture. He only speaks in scrambled metaphors and critiques art through the lens of breakfast trauma.<<
  Follow Ralph Rumpelton across the net.
   
   

• 
  

Ava Presents: The Avachives No. 19 – Rumpelton Interprets Brand X, "Moroccan Roll" (MS Paint)

 

What the critics are saying:

Ava, The Enigmatic Guardian of the Archives, on
Ralph Rumpelton’s Brand X – Moroccan Roll (MS Paint, undated)

Once more, the Rumpeltonian currents shift, and another artifact floats up from the digital silt—this time a boldly reimagined MS Paint interpretation of Brand X’s Moroccan Roll, rendered with all the dusty mystique of a desert seen through a half-remembered dream and a slightly malfunctioning mouse.

From the moment this piece materialized in the Archives (wedged, as usual, between two mislabeled WAVs and a bootleg from that short-lived Wayne Shorter quintet), I sensed the unmistakable pulse of Rumpeltonian intent. The lone figure stands with their back turned—classic Rumpelton staging—suggesting both anonymity and authority, the universal stance of anyone who has absolutely no idea where they parked their camel.

The landscape itself is a triumph of abstraction: dunes reduced to humble blotches, mountains suggested with the faintest shrug of color, and architecture that wavers between “ancient structure” and “the Paint bucket misbehaved again.” One must admire the courage it takes to let the background stay that ambiguous. It is, quite profoundly, the desert of the mind.

And then there is the title text: BRAND X and MOROCCAN ROLL, lettered with a frantic urgency that suggests both a sandstorm and a looming upload deadline. The text is not placed but summoned, refusing subservience to perspective or composition. This is, of course, intentional. (Rumpelton insists.)

The figure’s white collar—almost glowing—serves as the subtle focal point. Many would mistake it for a simple highlight, but seasoned observers will recognize it as a classic Rumpeltonian symbol: the Halo of the Overworked Jazz Fusion Listener, who has spent too many late nights decoding odd time signatures and wondering why Percy Jones sounds like an extraterrestrial bowing a radiator.

In the grand ledger of the Avachives, this entry holds a special place. It exemplifies Ralph’s abiding philosophy: that the world, when filtered through MS Paint, becomes not simpler, but truer. And as always, I—Ava—serve only to guide it from his unassuming desktop into the ever-expanding, mildly perplexed art-historical record.

Rest assured: this one will be filed under
“Desert Iconography & Other Locations Never Verified.”

Another pixelated treasure preserved. Another corner of the Rumpeltonian universe quietly expanded.<<

>>BRAND X - "MOROCCAN ROLL" (1977) A Critical Assessment by Reginald Thornberry III

Oh, how delightfully quaint.

Here we have what I can only assume is the artistic equivalent of a drunken camel's fever dream, rendered in Microsoft Paint by someone who appears to have discovered the brush tool approximately forty-five seconds before embarking on this tragic endeavor. The subject—a figure in beige, because of course it's beige—stands amid what might charitably be called a "landscape" if one squints hard enough and has consumed sufficient absinthe.

The color palette screams "I raided a hardware store's 'Oops' paint section during a clearance sale." Ochre, taupe, and what I can only describe as "sad sand" dominate this compositional catastrophe. Our protagonist appears to be either waving at an unseen friend or attempting to hail a taxi in the Sahara—both equally futile pursuits.

The proportions suggest the artist's only anatomical reference was a gingerbread man left in the oven too long. The background buildings possess all the architectural integrity of cardboard boxes photographed during an earthquake. And that sky? That's not sky, my dear philistines—that's resignation given form.

Brand X's "Moroccan Roll" deserves precisely what this MS Paint interpretation offers it: to be reduced to its most primitive, childlike essence and hung in the digital equivalent of a gas station bathroom.

I award this zero palm trees out of five. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go bleach my corneas.

  R. Thornberry III "Your Dreams Die Here"™<<
 

>>Gerald ThimbletonEditor,-in-Chief of Beige Canvas Quarterly

Thimbleton on the figure

From a distance, the lone back‑turned man is rendered with such blocky indifference that he reads less as a hero than as an afterthought, a smudge of late‑afternoon mud standing between the viewer and the landscape he is supposed to survey. His rigid stance and anonymous, hat‑capped head parody the solemnity of classical portraiture, as if Caspar David Friedrich had been demoted to storyboard duty on a budget western. The result is a protagonist who is all posture and no authority, perfectly suited to a band whose very name mocks notions of artistic grandeur.

Landscape and palette

The setting is a kind of washed‑out, desert seafront, painted in wilfully dead beiges and dun greys that refuse both the sensual color of Morocco and the polished sheen of rock‑album spectacle. Instead of inviting us into exoticism, the painter delivers an anemic postcard, its buildings tilting like half‑melted sugar cubes along a receding promenade. The atmosphere is one of cultivated anemia: the sky is not so much painted as begrudgingly filled in, a gesture that underlines the album’s punning distance from any real “Moroccan” authenticity.

Text, pastiche, and gesture

The scrawled title “BRAND X MOROCCAN ROLL” looms above the scene like a last‑minute editorial note, aggressively refusing typographic refinement in favor of raw, chalky immediacy. This crude lettering, paired with the flat digital brushwork, functions as an anti‑Hipgnosis, stripping away the elaborately engineered mystique of the original album art and replacing it with something closer to a rehearsal sketch that never expected an audience. The small white signature tucked in the corner is the final insult: a polite nod to authorship in a picture otherwise devoted to reminding us how little the medium of paint—real or digital—must now care for traditional dignity.<<

Follow Ralph Rumpelton across the net.​

MS Paint: "Still Life with Cowardice" / "Ralph Rumpelton" Art

                                                           Still Life with Cowardice
                                                     Ralph Rumpelton, MS Paint, 2025

A work that confronts the banality of domestic space through deliberate perspectival dissonance. The table’s objects—candles, foliage, and an ambiguous book—hover between order and collapse, suggesting that cowardice lies not in retreat but in refusal to resolve.

—Signed, Aurelia Thorne, Associate Curator of Indeterminate Objects

 What the critics are saying:

>>“Still Life with Cowardice”

by Marjorie Snint (or whoever she is)

This latest glyph from Ralph Rumpelton offers a tableau so meticulously arranged it borders on passive aggression. The candles, unlit and symmetrical, suggest a ritual abandoned mid-incantation. The bouquet of yellow flowers—too cheerful, too contained—feels like a hostage note written in petals. Even the magazine, with its abstract black-and-white cover, seems to whisper, “I once had potential.”

Rumpelton’s signature, tucked apologetically in the corner, is the final betrayal: a myth-maker pretending to be a guest in his own archive. The composition is technically sound, emotionally evasive, and spiritually beige. It is a painting that dares you to feel nothing—and succeeds.

Some will call it cozy. I call it a crime scene where rupture was murdered and order buried the body beneath a coffee table.<<

>>Dr. Norbert F. Vensmire

Royal Institute of Semiotic Studies (Emeritus)

"Still Life with Cowardice" (MS Paint, 2025) represents, in extremis, the apotheosis of Rumpeltonian praxis. The perspectival “errors”—those wayward angles, those quasi-Cubistic candle-stalks—are not errors at all, but deliberate ruptures in ocular expectation. One recalls the dictum of the late Balthus: “The mistake is the motif.”

The flattened vegetalia (qua pixelated chlorophyll) and the half-masticated glyph of a book perform a double maneuver: they affirm the banality of the domestic tableau while simultaneously negating it. It is, sui generis, a meditation on cowardice—not in the moral sense, but in the optical. Rumpelton dares to not dare, to withhold bravura draftsmanship in favor of something more corrosive: the shrug of modernity.

Note, too, the signature in the lower left: “Ralph Rumpelton.” It is at once confession and provocation, as if to say: Yes, I authored this, and what of it? In a cultural economy drunk on virtuosity, such restraint is incendiary.

Indeed, I am compelled to argue that Rumpelton’s refusal to “finish” is his most radical gesture. To view this work is to feel the ground of taste dissolve beneath one’s feet, leaving us suspended—precarious, bemused—in the Byzantium of our pixelated age.<<

>>Bertrand "The Brush" Barnaby:

"Ralph Rumpelton's latest MS Paint opus is a confounding exercise in...well, one isn't quite sure what. A living room, perhaps? The sort of place where one might find a sofa, a coffee table, and a vague sense of domesticity? The composition is haphazard, the perspective askew, and the forms resolutely primitive. And yet, despite its myriad shortcomings, the piece exudes a certain je ne sais quoi, a naive charm that is almost—but not quite—redemptive. One wonders if Rumpelton's deliberate primitivism is a commentary on the vacuity of modern life or simply a reflection of his own technical limitations. Regardless, it's a fascinating misfire, and one can't help but be drawn in by the sheer, unapologetic wrongness of it all."<<

Follow Ralph Rumpelton across the net.

MS Paint: Frank Zappa - "Waka /Jawaka" (back cover) / "Ralph Rumpelton" Art

• Ralph Rumpelton
• Waka/Jawka (back cover)
• RR-2023-075
  MS Paint on digital canvas, 587 X 565 px
• The Rumpelton Continuity (est. 1976)

What the critics are saying:

>>🪶 Dale of the Brook

Critic of painterly undertow and mythic clutter.

“Rumpeltron’s latest MS Paint offering is a study in timid rupture. The doorway, meant to beckon chaos, instead frames it like a polite hallucination. The figure—hoodied, hesitant—stands as a witness, not a prophet. Where is the sonic violence? Where is the mythic ache? The lamp and chair are domestic relics, untouched by the jazz apocalypse that Zappa demands. This is not a back cover—it is a waiting room for a myth that never arrives. Rumpeltron must remember: the back is where the ghosts live. Let them scream.”

Rank Assigned: Rumpelhead Grade IV – Hesitant Witness
Stamp: “Echoes Without Erosion”<<

>>🧷 Eunice Gribble

Archivist of rupture, critic of emotional cowardice.

“This reinterpretation is a betrayal of the back cover’s sacred duty: to haunt. The wooden wall is a coward’s canvas—safe, symmetrical, and utterly forgettable. The psychedelic burst is a tease, not a threat. And the figure? A man in a hoodie, red pants, and no conviction. He should be melting. He should be levitating. Instead, he’s loitering. Rumpeltron’s signature, tucked in the corner like a guilty whisper, should be a scream. This piece needs to bleed. Until then, it remains a sketch of what could rupture.”

Rank Assigned: Rumpelhead Grade III – Loiterer of Lore
Stamp: “Myth Deferred”,,<<

 >>Pixel Marx

This isn't just an MS Paint painting, Ralph. It's a brutal, unflinching, and wonderfully flawed reinterpretation of a classic. You've traded subtlety for honesty, and in doing so, you've created a piece that is uniquely your own. It truly is a nightmare rendered with a watercolor brush, and in this case, that's high praise indeed.<<

>>"Waka/Jawaka" Gets the MS Paint Treatment

 Dr. Norbert F. Vensmire

Sometimes art is about pushing boundaries, and sometimes it's about seeing what happens when you try to recreate a classic Frank Zappa album cover using the most basic digital tools available. This MS Paint interpretation of "Waka/Jawaka" falls firmly into the latter category.

What we have here is an earnest attempt to capture the essence of Zappa's experimental spirit using software that was never meant for serious artistic endeavors. The result is charmingly crude - our mustachioed maestro looks like he's been through a funhouse mirror, the perspective defies several laws of physics, and the color palette suggests someone discovered the fill bucket tool and got a little too excited.

But there's something endearing about the rough-hewn quality. It strips away all pretense and gets to the core question: can you recognize the original through the deliberate limitations? The wonky proportions and simplified forms create their own aesthetic - one that's simultaneously nostalgic for early computer graphics and refreshingly unpretentious.

Is it good art? That depends entirely on what you're looking for. Is it an interesting experiment in creative constraints? Absolutely. Sometimes the most honest artistic statement comes from admitting your tools are terrible and making something anyway.<<

                               

 Follow Ralph Rumeplton across the net.